Le moyen fait grief au pouvoir adjudicateur d’avoir, en adoptant la d\u00e9cision d’attribution, attribu\u00e9 le march\u00e9 litigieux en ayant \u00e9gard \u00e0 des sous-crit\u00e8res cot\u00e9s qui n’avaient pas \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9alablement annonc\u00e9s. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante soutient qu’en proc\u00e9dant de la sorte, le pouvoir adjudicateur a m\u00e9connu les articles 66 et 81 de la loi du 17 juin 2016, dans l’interpr\u00e9tation qu’ils doivent recevoir conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l’enseignement jurisprudentiel des arr\u00eats prononc\u00e9s par la Cour de justice de l’Union europ\u00e9enne (aff. C-331\/04 et aff. C-532-06). Il ressort de l’enseignement de ces arr\u00eats qu’une mani\u00e8re de proc\u00e9der telle que celle critiqu\u00e9e par le moyen n’est pas interdite en toute hypoth\u00e8se, mais que son admissibilit\u00e9 est subordonn\u00e9e au respect de trois conditions pr\u00e9cises, \u00e0 savoir qu’elle \u00ab\u00a0ne modifie pas les crit\u00e8res d’attribution du march\u00e9 d\u00e9finis dans le cahier des charges ou dans l’avis de march\u00e9; ne contienne pas d’\u00e9l\u00e9ments qui, s’ils avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 connus lors de la pr\u00e9paration des offres, auraient pu influencer cette pr\u00e9paration; n’ait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9e en prenant en compte des \u00e9l\u00e9ments susceptibles d’avoir un effet discriminatoire envers l’un des soumissionnaires\u00a0\u00bb. Il s’ensuit que, pour invoquer les dispositions vis\u00e9es dans une interpr\u00e9tation conforme \u00e0 la jurisprudence pr\u00e9cit\u00e9e, le moyen doit \u00e9tablir que, par le proc\u00e9d\u00e9 critiqu\u00e9 de mise en oeuvre des crit\u00e8res pr\u00e9alablement annonc\u00e9s, le pouvoir adjudicateur a m\u00e9connu l’une des trois conditions fix\u00e9es par l’enseignement jurisprudentiel rappel\u00e9. Lorsque la requ\u00eate ne contient aucun d\u00e9veloppement servant la d\u00e9monstration requise, il doit \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 soit comme reposant sur une interpr\u00e9tation des dispositions non conformes \u00e0 celle qu’ils appellent dans la ligne de la jurisprudence dont la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante entend se pr\u00e9valoir, soit comme ne r\u00e9pondant pas \u00e0 l’exigence d’exposer en quoi ont \u00e9t\u00e9 m\u00e9connus les dispositions dont il invoque la violation au regard de l’interpr\u00e9tation que la jurisprudence pr\u00e9cit\u00e9e imposerait, selon la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante, de leur donner. Dans la premi\u00e8re hypoth\u00e8se, le moyen doit \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme manquant en droit; dans la seconde, il doit \u00eatre d\u00e9clar\u00e9 irrecevable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Le moyen fait grief au pouvoir adjudicateur d’avoir, en adoptant la d\u00e9cision d’attribution, attribu\u00e9 le march\u00e9 litigieux en ayant \u00e9gard \u00e0 des sous-crit\u00e8res cot\u00e9s qui n’avaient pas \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9alablement annonc\u00e9s. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 requ\u00e9rante soutient qu’en proc\u00e9dant de la sorte, le pouvoir adjudicateur a m\u00e9connu les articles 66 et 81 de la loi du 17 juin […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"ocean_post_layout":"","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"0","ocean_second_sidebar":"0","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"0","ocean_custom_header_template":"0","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"0","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"off","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-jurisprudence","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3383"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3387,"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3383\/revisions\/3387"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/march\u00e9spublics.be\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}